Leak Testing
Our full cleanroom services include a range of testing, including leak testing, for helium and positive pressure testing. Macfab’s focus on providing a low total cost of ownership through quality work is enabled through our leak testing of prototype and production parts.
Leak testing is a form of Non-Destructive Testing (NDT). This type of testing allows for validation of the part and process, without sacrificing or scrapping the part. Our Agilent vacuum, leak detectors, and innovative custom testing systems will ensure your parts arrive as expected.
Macfab practices these leak testing methods in order of sensitivity:
Air Pressure (Vacuum) Decay
Air Pressure (Vacuum) Decay utilizes air up to 80 pounds per square inch (PSI) in a vacuum. This process reduces the variation caused by temperature, has a higher throughput than other methods, and can detect multiple defects if present.
Bubble Immersion
The Bubble Immersion method is used to test welds and sealing of assemblies. The test piece can be pressurized at 3 to 40 PSI with a maximum of 125 PSI and submerged in a tank of water. The inspector then looks for bubbles indicating a defect.
Helium Mass Spectrometry
At nearly double the sensitivity of the bubble test method is Helium Mass Spectrometry 100x to 1,000,000x. This method requires developing a negative pressure difference between the test part and the atmosphere. This method can record a quantitative measurement volume of cubic centimetres per second (atm cc/sec) of the leak rate. Depending on the configuration of the part/assembly and the precision with which this testing is done, the location of the leak(s) can often be identified on the part.
The testing methods Macfab performs are highlighted.
Additional information in the table are other testing methods and their comparison for reference.
Method | Quantifiable Result | Locate Leak | Global 1 | Go/ No Go | Test Media | Test Volume Dept.2 | Relative Cost |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Air Pressure (Vacuum) Decay | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Air | Yes | Medium |
Mass Flow | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Air | Yes | Medium |
Dye Liquid Tracers | No | Yes | No | No | Liquid | No | Low |
Bubble Immersion | No | Yes | No | No | Air | No | Low |
Thermal Conductivity Sniffing | Limited | Yes | No | Yes3 | Helium | No | Low |
Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) Sniffing | Limited | Yes | No | Yes3 | SF6 | No | Low-Med |
Helium Mass Spec Sniffing | Limited | Yes | No | Yes3 | Helium | No | Med-High |
Helium Mass spec Atmosphere Accumulation | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Helium | Yes | High |
Helium Mass Spec Hard Vacuum | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Helium | No | High |
Trace Gas Mass Spec Hard Vacuum | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | R134a, SF6, Air, H2, NO2, CO2 | No | High |
Clarification Points
1. The test method measures the part’s global leak rate versus individual leaks.
2. The test volume significantly affects the test cycle time and/or sensitivity.
3. Results may vary based on skill of operator.
While no process is error-free, our investment in multiple methods and a range of leak testing sensitivities provides us with options to meet our customers’ expectations from engineering specifications, quality verifications, and supply chain requirements.